We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Preddy v Bull (Liberty intervening), Hall v Same (Same intervening).
- Authors
McFaul, Hugh
- Abstract
Discrimination – Sexual orientation – Less favourable treatment –Homosexual couple in civil partnership refused a double room by hoteliers – Hoteliers holding sincere religious belief that sexual intercourse outside traditional marriage sinful – Homosexual couple claiming damages pursuant to subordinate legislation for unlawful discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation – Hoteliers conceding refusal amounting to indirect discrimination – Whether refusal direct discrimination – If not whether indirect discrimination could be justified – Whether subordinate legislation compatible with hoteliers’ right to manifest religion – Human Rights Act 1998, Sch 1, Pt 1, art 9 – Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/1263), reg 3(1)(4)
- Subjects
SEXUAL orientation; GAY couples; SEX discrimination; SEXUAL intercourse; BELIEF &; doubt; HOTELKEEPERS
- Publication
Oxford Journal of Law & Religion, 2014, Vol 3, Issue 2, p362
- ISSN
2047-0770
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/ojlr/rwu017