We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Unilateral Inaction: Congressional Gridlock, Interbranch Conflict, and Public Evaluations of Executive Power.
- Authors
Reeves, Andrew; Rogowski, Jon C.
- Abstract
Presidents routinely overpromise and underdeliver, especially amid partisan polarization, narrow congressional majorities, and persistent gridlock. As Congress routinely stymies their legislative agendas, presidents consider alternative courses of action. We study public reactions to unilateral power in the context of congressional inaction. While some research suggests that presidents cannot afford to pass up opportunities to act, more recent scholarship indicates that the public holds negative views of unilateral power and disapproves of its use. Survey experiments conducted with a national sample of Americans provide evidence of the costs of unilateral power. Across three policy areas and between‐ and within‐respondent analyses, the public responds negatively when presidents exercise unilateral power rather than accept the status quo, even among individuals who share the president's policy views. Our results suggest that while legislative gridlock may increase the appeal of unilateral power, its use may come at a public cost.
- Subjects
EXECUTIVE power; ELECTRICITY pricing; PARTISANSHIP; PRESIDENTS
- Publication
Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2022, Vol 47, Issue 2, p427
- ISSN
0362-9805
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/lsq.12353