We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Cardiac output wireless wearable devices are maybe not interchangeable with Swan-Ganz catheters yet, but the question is... have they reached mininvasive tools?
- Authors
Vetrugno, Luigi; Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio; Deana, Cristian; Bellini, Valentina; Bignami, Elena Giovanna
- Abstract
The article discusses the agreement between continuous cardiac output (CCO) measured with a wireless wearable pulse device and a Swan-Ganz (SG) catheter after cardiac surgery. The study found that the two methods were not interchangeable when using a 30% threshold, but were interchangeable under a 45% threshold. These findings are supported by a recent systematic review and meta-analysis. The authors emphasize the importance of considering the trend towards less invasive surgical procedures and the potential complications associated with invasive monitoring tools. They also mention the limitations of the wireless wearable device, such as lack of CE approval and the need for cost-benefit analysis. The authors suggest reporting the ejection fraction of patients and considering the impact of arteriovenous fistula in hemodialyzed patients. Overall, the article highlights the progress in surgical technology and the potential of wireless wearable pulse devices in clinical practice.
- Subjects
PULSE wave analysis; COST benefit analysis; PERIOPERATIVE care; CARDIAC output; TECHNOLOGICAL progress; SURGICAL robots; ARTERIAL catheters
- Publication
Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing, 2024, Vol 38, Issue 4, p869
- ISSN
1387-1307
- Publication type
Letter
- DOI
10.1007/s10877-024-01167-w