We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Research Productivity Norms Among Canadian I-O Psychology Scholars.
- Authors
White, Nicholas C.; Minnikin, Amy F.; Malo, Owen R.; Beck, James W.
- Abstract
We present research output norms for Canadian industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists. Previous studies have presented publication norms for the field as a whole (Bowling & Burns, 2010; Vancouver et al., 2008). Yet, in many cases, research output relative to other Canadian scholars is an important metric, as Canadian scholars compete for the same pool of graduate students and grant funding. To this end, we recorded each Canadian I-O faculty member's publications in the 38 I-O journals identified by Highhouse et al. (2020). Furthermore, we used Highhouse et al.'s journal prestige rankings to compute an indicator of research output taking both quantity and quality into account. PhD year was used to compute productivity-per-year statistics, thereby equating scholars on opportunity to perform. Norms are also presented split by employment setting (psychology programme vs. business school), academic rank, and among the five I-O psychology PhD-granting programmes in Canada. The norms presented in this article are useful for prospective graduate students seeking to identify potential PhD supervisors, as well as scholars who wish to communicate their output relative to these norms to granting agencies, tenure/promotion committees, and during performance reviews.
- Subjects
CANADA; LABOR productivity statistics; PUBLISHING; SCHOLARLY method; SERIAL publications; COLLEGE teachers; PSYCHOLOGISTS; APPLIED psychology; INDUSTRIAL psychology; MEDICAL research; CORPORATE culture
- Publication
Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne, 2024, Vol 65, Issue 1, p28
- ISSN
0708-5591
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1037/cap0000381