We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation of the 2024 Mw7.45 Noto Peninsula Earthquake.
- Authors
Yang, Siyuan; Sang, Chengfang; Hu, Yan; Wang, Kai
- Abstract
An unexpected Mw7.45 earthquake struck the Noto Peninsula on 1 January 2024, preceded by several long‐living earthquake swarms, providing a valuable opportunity to study seismic and aseismic slips, as well as their interactions. We derived coseismic and 19‐day postseismic slip distributions by inverting co‐ and post‐seismic displacements from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) data. The inverted coseismic slip distribution shows two slip patches, with a maximum slip of ∼4 m. The early postseismic afterslip is 0.1–0.25 m within coseismic slip asperity and 0.1–0.6 m northward of the rupture area. The afterslip within the rupture area is accompanied by numerous aftershocks and coincides with a ∼6 MPa stress drop, suggesting that aftershocks are likely driven by the afterslip. The pattern of poroelastic rebound implies a potential effect of fluid flow on aftershock triggering. This study sheds lights on the intricate interplay between seismic and aseismic processes following large earthquakes. Plain Language Summary: A Mw7.45 earthquake hit the northeastern tip of the Noto Peninsula on 1 January 2024. This region has hosted several long earthquake swarms. This unusual earthquake provides a good opportunity to explore the fault behaviors following a major earthquake. The coseismic and early postseismic deformation have been well recorded at the GNSS stations with unprecedentedly high spatial and temporal resolutions. We inverted the coseismic and early postseismic slip distributions from the GNSS data. The coseismic slip distributes mostly in two patches and reaches up to approximately 4 m. The 19‐day postseismic slip distributes mainly in the coseismic slip region as well as to the north of it. The postseismic slip in the rupture area overlapped with the aftershocks. The result suggests that these aftershocks were likely triggered by the afterslip. Additionally, the pattern of poroelastic rebound implies that fluid flow may play a role in triggering these aftershocks. This study helps advance our understanding of earthquake‐triggering mechanisms and fault behaviors following large earthquakes. Key Points: We inverted coseismic and early afterslip distributions of Noto Peninsula earthquake using co‐ and post‐seismic displacements from Global Navigation Satellite SystemThe early afterslip occurred within and to the north of the two main coseismic slip patchesThe occurrence of aftershocks may result from the early afterslip and possible fluid flow
- Subjects
EARTHQUAKE aftershocks; EARTHQUAKES; GLOBAL Positioning System; EARTHQUAKE swarms; NATURAL disaster warning systems; FLUID flow; PENINSULAS
- Publication
Geophysical Research Letters, 2024, Vol 51, Issue 11, p1
- ISSN
0094-8276
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1029/2024GL108843