We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
ALL (NOT) ABOARD: THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT SPLITS WITH THE ELEVENTH, FOURTH, AND SEVENTH CIRCUITS BY DETERMINING A SINGLE-PARTICIPANT "PLAN" IS NOT AN ERISA PLAN IN DAKOTA, MINNESOTA & EASTERN RAILROAD CORP. V. SCHIEFFER.
- Authors
BRIAN BARTELS, P.
- Abstract
The article focuses on the U.S. court case Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corp. v. Schieffer, which dealt with the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Topics include the fiduciary responsibility for employee benefit plans, subject matter jurisdiction, and judicial interpretation of the term 'plan.'
- Subjects
UNITED States; DAKOTA, Minnesota &; Eastern Railroad Corp.; EMPLOYEE Retirement Income Security Act of 1974; PENSION laws; EMPLOYEE benefit laws; FIDUCIARY responsibility; SUBJECT matter jurisdiction (Law); ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
Creighton Law Review, 2014, Vol 47, Issue 4, p539
- ISSN
0011-1155
- Publication type
Article