We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Are Classical Assessments Offering Adequate Insight into Post-Pandemic Teaching Methods?
- Authors
Leach, M. A.; McLean, A. M.; McLean, K. J.
- Abstract
Educators must continuously assess and adjust to maximize the amount of information students retain. One way to evaluate teaching effectiveness is thru pre- and post-semester assessments. Factors such as individual willingness to participate can affect the validity of these assessments. Our hypothesis was that students will more actively participate in a group activity compared with written pre- and post-semester assessments. In this study, we evaluated 3 different types of pre- and post-assessments to assess knowledge retention and participation. Participation decreased as the semester progressed resulting in only 31 of 57 students who completed all 6 of the assessments. There was an interaction (p < 0.001) between the type (individual, team, or activity) and time of assessment. The percentage of correct answers increased (p < 0.001) between pre-semester (average 32.92 ± 1.58) and postsemester assessments (average 47.54 ± 1.58). There was a correlation (p = 0.04) between the final course grade and the post-semester individual written assessment. In conclusion, participation throughout the semester is a major issue in assessing teaching quality and knowledge retention and the utilization of group activities does not appear to impact that participation. However, the best assessment for knowledge learned remains the classical written individual assessment.
- Subjects
TEACHING methods; STUDENT participation; EFFECTIVE teaching; EDUCATORS; STUDENT activities
- Publication
NACTA Journal, 2023, Vol 67, p177
- ISSN
0149-4910
- Publication type
Article