We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Slurs under quotation.
- Authors
Rinner, Stefan; Hieke, Alexander
- Abstract
Against content theories of slurs, according to which slurs have some kind of derogatory content, Anderson and Lepore have objected that they cannot explain that even slurs under quotation can cause offense. If slurs had some kind of derogatory content, the argument goes, quotation would render this content inert and, thus, quoted slurs should not be offensive. Following this, Anderson and Lepore propose that slurs are offensive because they are prohibited words. In this paper, we will show that, pace Anderson and Lepore, content theories of slurs do provide an explanation of the fact that quoted slurs can cause offense: even under quotation, the explanation goes, the derogatory content of a slur can still be psychologically efficacious. We will go one step further by pointing out that offensiveness is not the only function of slurs, but that slurs can also be used to create and reinforce negative attitudes towards the target group. While content theories can easily explain this by referring to some kind of derogatory content, Anderson and Lepore's prohibitionism will lack a satisfactory explanation of this second function of slurs. Concluding, we will argue that, unlike uses of slurs, uses of quoted slurs normally do not derogate the target group. This will again speak in favor of content theories. Accordingly, uses of quoted slurs are not derogatory because quotation renders the derogatory content inert. Hence, rather than speaking against content theories, quoted slurs speak in their favor.
- Subjects
DISCRIMINATORY language; QUOTATIONS; VOCABULARY; OBSCENE words; SWEARING (Profanity)
- Publication
Philosophical Studies, 2022, Vol 179, Issue 5, p1483
- ISSN
0031-8116
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11098-021-01715-z