We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
ASSATEAGUE COASTKELEPER V. HUDSON FARM: HOLDING THAT A SUPERVISING COMPANY CAN BE LIABLE FOR WATERWAY POLLUTION EXPANDS THE CONTROL OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT WHILE POTENTIALLY TAKING THE BURDEN OFF CONTRACTING FARMS AND A LOCAL FARMING ECONOMY.
- Authors
Biggs, Melissa
- Abstract
The article discusses a court case of Assateague Coastkeeper vs. Waterkeeper Alliance Sue Hudson Farm related to environmental pollution in Maryland. It offers information on the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (CWA) that was enacted in 1948 and expanded in 1972. It states that the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) are responsible for the implementation and regulation of CWA programs.
- Subjects
MARYLAND; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); GOVERNMENT regulation; POLLUTION; WATER pollution
- Publication
University of Baltimore Journal of Environmental Law, 2010, Vol 18, Issue 1, p89
- ISSN
1062-6212
- Publication type
Article