We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Correcting the scientific record: Legitimation strategies in retraction notices.
- Authors
Lin, Yuting
- Abstract
The retraction of a previously published research article, often due to the discovery of fraud or scientific error, can pose considerable threat to an author's career and reputation. This paper examines legitimation strategies in the retraction notice (RN), a document in which authors formally announce their decision to retract an article. By analyzing 300 RNs published between 2010–2021 in Q1 biomedical journals, this study finds that 76% RNs contain at least one legitimation strategy, with Mortification, Full/Partial Denial, and Corrective Action being the most frequently used. Moreover, a comparison of RNs that report fraud, misconduct, error, unreliable data/results, and other similar matters shows that fraud-related RNs have the highest incidence of legitimation strategies. Authors committing fraud often employ Mortification, Disclaimer, and Reassurance, while authors reporting scientific errors put more emphasis on Good Intention and Perseverance. This study contributes to the understanding of legitimation and image repair in scientific discourse.
- Subjects
FRAUD; SCIENTIFIC errors; MORTIFICATION; LEGITIMATION (Sociology); RETRACTION letters
- Publication
Pragmatics & Society, 2024, Vol 15, Issue 4, p532
- ISSN
1878-9714
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1075/ps.22008.lin