We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Nonattributive and Nonreferential Uses of Definite Descriptions.
- Authors
Matuszkiewicz, Maria
- Abstract
This paper revisits Donnellan's distinction between referential and attributive uses of definite descriptions and argues that it is not exhaustive. Donnellan characterizes the distinction in terms of two criteria: the speaker's intentions and the type of content the speaker aims to express. I argue that contrary to the common view, these two criteria are independent and that the distinctive features may be coinstantiated in more than two ways. This leaves room for nonattributive and nonreferential uses of definite descriptions. Kripke's notions of general and specific intentions provide a framework that accommodates such cases. Additionally, it proves useful for the analysis of the use of proper names with specific nonsingular intentions. The paper also discusses how the interpretation of the use of definite descriptions as attributive or referential (or neither) is sensitive to which theory of singular thoughts one adopts.
- Subjects
DESCRIPTION (Philosophy); SEMANTICS; UNIQUENESS (Philosophy); NAMES; ORATORS
- Publication
Philosophia, 2024, Vol 52, Issue 2, p305
- ISSN
0048-3893
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11406-024-00727-3