We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Theorizing from Qualitative Research in Public Administration: Plurality through a Combination of Rigor and Richness.
- Authors
Ashworth, Rachel Elizabeth; McDermott, Aoife Mary; Currie, Graeme
- Abstract
Scholars emphasize the need for additional rigor in qualitative research. This inadvertently encourages formulaic and standardized approaches that undermine the benefits of theorizing from rich data. Our study extends debate by emphasizing the importance of sound qualitative public administration research that blends rigor with richness and thereby facilitates effective theorization. Evidence from a narrative review of 31 qualitative studies published within six leading public administration journals demonstrates that effective theorizing is linked to transparency in research design, analytic approach, and theoretical contribution. In-depth interrogation of four studies that illustrate "inductive theorizing" and "abductive theorizing" identifies plurality in the balance struck between rigor and richness. We derive a broad set of principles that enable researchers to make a convincing "conceptual leap" between data, analysis, and contribution. We also emphasize the need to accommodate pluralistic approaches to theorizing by nuancing requirements for essential aspects of qualitative reporting, versus those amenable to variation.
- Subjects
SCHOLARS; RESEARCH personnel; QUALITATIVE research; RIGOR mortis; SPECIES diversity
- Publication
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 2019, Vol 29, Issue 2, p318
- ISSN
1053-1858
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/jopart/muy057