We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
趙翼的古文《尚書》觀點--以漢、宋學為核心問題的個案研究.
- Authors
曹 美 秀
- Abstract
This article examines Zhao Yi's (趙翼) understanding of the Shangshu (尚 書) from the perspective of Han-Song Learning. Zhao Yi is generally accepted as an Evidential Learning (kaoju,考據) historian of during the Qianjia (乾嘉) period of the Qing dynasty. He, however, did not consider the Guwen Shangshu (古文尚 書) to be a forgery. His research was firmly entrenched in the kaoju circle, having extensive experience with historical evidential scholarship without the standpoint of Han-Song learning. He thus disagreed with lixue (理學), especially the concept that li (理) exists before qi (氣); but unlike most scholars of that line he did not support the theory of a forged Guwen Shangshu. He still focused on the problem of Classical syudying although his research is not generally accepted as canonical. Examining Zhao Yi's position of Guwen Shangshu helps to reconsider the common view that combines the studies of Han learning, kaoju, and wei guwen (偽古文) together as being objective, in contrast to Song learning, yi li(義理), and in opposition to weiguwen, both of which are seen as subjective. In this way, Zhou Yi's evidential scholarship on the Guwen Shangshu with his examination of historical reality as a historian can help us to better understand the important issues of Guwen Shangshu, the history of the Shangshu study in the Qing dynasty, and Chinese intellectual history.
- Subjects
CHINA; ZHAO Yi; QING dynasty, China, 1644-1912; FORGERY; INTELLECTUAL history; INTELLECTUALS; HISTORY
- Publication
Humanitas Taiwanica, 2017, Issue 87, p1
- ISSN
1015-2687
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.6258/bcla.2017.87.01