We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing end of year summary 2019: hemodynamic monitoring and management.
- Authors
Saugel, Bernd; Critchley, Lester A. H.; Kaufmann, Thomas; Flick, Moritz; Kouz, Karim; Vistisen, Simon T.; Scheeren, Thomas W. L.
- Abstract
Hemodynamic monitoring is essential to provide optimal hemodynamic management to patients in perioperative and intensive care medicine. In 90 patients, the continuous blood pressure signal of the CNAP system was compared to intermittent oscillometric blood pressure set at five-minute intervals. The EuroSCORE II was calculated in all 147 patients, while the STS Mortality and Morbidity Index was only available in 115 patients (78%) having coronary artery bypass graft, aortic, or mitral valve surgery. Vetrugno et al. [[6]] compared transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output (VolumeView/EV1000/Hemosphere; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) to pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output (pulmonary artery catheter and Vigilance/Hemosphere monitor; Edwards Lifesciences) in 49 patients undergoing liver transplant surgery. Cesur et al. compared a PVI-guided pGDT (using a PVI threshold of > 13% to trigger a 250 mL colloid administration) with a conventional fluid management (CFM; based on blood pressure, heart rate, central venous pressure (CVP) and urine output) in 70 patients having colorectal surgery.
- Subjects
HEMODYNAMIC monitoring; CARDIAC output; SITTING position; AMBULATORY blood pressure monitoring; RECOVERY rooms; LEFT heart ventricle
- Publication
Journal of Clinical Monitoring & Computing, 2020, Vol 34, Issue 2, p207
- ISSN
1387-1307
- Publication type
journal article
- DOI
10.1007/s10877-020-00496-w