We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Non-Governmental Organisations and National Human Rights Institutions monitoring the execution of Strasbourg Judgments: An Empirical Perspective on Rule 9 Communications.
- Authors
Erken, Elif
- Abstract
This article considers a scarcely explored perspective in relation to the execution of judgments of the ECtHR, notably, the formal involvement of NGOs and NHRIs. Rule 9(2) of the Committee of Minister Rules' allows NGOs and NHRIs to participate in the supervision process for the execution of the Court's judgments by submitting reports (Communications) in which these actors review and assess domestic authorities' performance with respect to judgment execution. On the basis of interviews with important stakeholders, this article provides an all-round user-based perspective of this Rule 9 mechanism and its perceived impact. Doing so elucidates whether the Rule 9 procedure allows NGOs and NHRIs to engage in the important cycle of reporting and pressuring for change, the conclusions of which are important in assessing if and how Rule 9 works to advance the execution of judgments of the ECtHR.
- Subjects
EUROPEAN Court of Human Rights; CIVIL society; LEGAL judgments; HUMAN rights; NONGOVERNMENTAL organizations; NATIONAL human rights institutions
- Publication
Human Rights Law Review, 2021, Vol 21, Issue 3, p724
- ISSN
1461-7781
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/hrlr/ngab007