We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
DISPUTE OVER WHETHER INSURANCE COMPANY PROVIDES THE LEVEL OF BENEFITS REQUIRED BY COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT IS ARBITRABLE UNDER A CLAUSE REFERRING TO "THE INTERPRETATION OR THE APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT."
- Abstract
This article focuses on the court ruling given in American Bosch Arma Corp. v. Stewart case. Dispute over whether insurance company provides the level of benefits required by collective bargaining agreement is arbitrable under a clause referring to "the interpretation or the application of the provisions of this agreement." Reversing, in a memorandum decision with a majority of five to two, the courts below the Court of Appeals remitted the matter to Special Term, directing arbitration of the union's claim.
- Subjects
LEGAL judgments; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); ARBITRATION &; award; COLLECTIVE bargaining; COMMERCIAL arbitration agreements; LABOR unions; INSURANCE companies
- Publication
Arbitration Journal, 1965, Vol 20, Issue 2, p120
- ISSN
0003-7893
- Publication type
Article