We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Krill Oil for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Authors
Laslett, Laura L.; Scheepers, Lieke E. J. M.; Antony, Benny; Wluka, Anita E.; Cai, Guoqi; Hill, Catherine L.; March, Lyn; Keen, Helen I.; Otahal, Petr; Cicuttini, Flavia M.; Jones, Graeme
- Abstract
Key Points: Question: In people with knee osteoarthritis who have significant knee pain and effusion-synovitis present on magnetic resonance imaging, does krill oil supplementation, compared with placebo, improve knee pain? Findings: In this randomized clinical trial that included 262 adults, compared with placebo, 2 g/d of krill oil supplementation did not improve knee pain as measured on a visual analog scale (range, 0-100, with 0 indicating least pain) (mean difference, 0.30; 95% CI, −6.9 to 6.4; P =.94) over 24 weeks. Meaning: This study does not support 2 g/d of krill oil supplementation for improving knee pain in people with knee osteoarthritis who have significant knee pain and effusion-synovitis. Importance: Knee osteoarthritis is disabling, with few effective treatments. Preliminary evidence suggested that krill oil supplementation improved knee pain, but effects on knee osteoarthritis remain unclear. Objective: To evaluate efficacy of krill oil supplementation, compared with placebo, on knee pain in people with knee osteoarthritis who have significant knee pain and effusion-synovitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 5 Australian cities. Participants with clinical knee osteoarthritis, significant knee pain, and effusion-synovitis on magnetic resonance imaging were enrolled from December 2016 to June 2019; final follow-up occurred on February 7, 2020. Interventions: Participants were randomized to 2 g/d of krill oil (n = 130) or matching placebo (n = 132) for 24 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in knee pain as assessed by visual analog scale (range, 0-100; 0 indicating least pain; minimum clinically important improvement = 15) over 24 weeks. Results: Of 262 participants randomized (mean age, 61.6 [SD, 9.6] years; 53% women), 222 (85%) completed the trial. Krill oil did not improve knee pain compared with placebo (mean change in VAS score, −19.9 [krill oil] vs −20.2 [placebo]; between-group mean difference, −0.3; 95% CI, −6.9 to 6.4) over 24 weeks. One or more adverse events was reported by 51% in the krill oil group (67/130) and by 54% in the placebo group (71/132). The most common adverse events were musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, which occurred 32 times in the krill oil group and 42 times in the placebo group, including knee pain (n = 10 with krill oil; n = 9 with placebo), lower extremity pain (n = 1 with krill oil; n = 5 with placebo), and hip pain (n = 3 with krill oil; n = 2 with placebo). Conclusions and Relevance: Among people with knee osteoarthritis who have significant knee pain and effusion-synovitis on magnetic resonance imaging, 2 g/d of daily krill oil supplementation did not improve knee pain over 24 weeks compared with placebo. These findings do not support krill oil for treating knee pain in this population. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12616000726459; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1181-7087 This randomized clinical trial assesses the effect of krill oil supplementation vs placebo on knee pain improvement in patients with knee osteoarthritis, significant knee pain, and effusion-synovitis.
- Subjects
NEW Zealand; KNEE pain; KRILL oil; KNEE osteoarthritis; CLINICAL trials; MAGNETIC resonance imaging; VISUAL analog scale
- Publication
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 2024, Vol 331, Issue 23, p1997
- ISSN
0098-7484
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1001/jama.2024.6063