We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The Judgements of Regency Literature.
- Authors
Sleigh, Charlotte
- Abstract
This article outlines two Regency modes of reading: one drawn from the political philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832), and the other from the gentleman of science William Whewell (1794-1866). Bentham's readings are presented as an experiment in radical democracy that was almost, but not quite, effaced by the idealist mode introduced one generation later by Whewell. These modes of reading, and the textual judgements that they entailed, are used to help understand the epistemology of scientific evidence in the Regency era. It is claimed that both literary and scientific judgements were, at root, political, and furthermore that judgement in the courtroom formed their model. Multiple levels of nested and epistolary fiction enabled readers to rehearse and attend to political arguments about the nature of scientific evidence: evidence that, in an era of high political tension, decided the case about nothing less than their own selfhood.
- Subjects
REGENCY fiction; HISTORICAL fiction; BENTHAM, Jeremy, 1748-1832; WHEWELL, William, 1794-1866; BOOKS &; reading; ENGLISH epistolary fiction; 19TH century English literature; LITERARY criticism; FRANKENSTEIN: Or, the Modern Prometheus (Book); SARTOR Resartus (Book : Carlyle); SHELLEY, Mary Wollstonecraft, 1797-1851; CARLYLE, Thomas, 1795-1881; ENGLISH fiction -- History &; criticism
- Publication
Literature & History, 2010, Vol 19, Issue 2, p1
- ISSN
0306-1973
- Publication type
Literary Criticism
- DOI
10.7227/LH.19.2.1