We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Autonomous robotic surgery for zygomatic implant placement and immediately loaded implant-supported full-arch prosthesis: a preliminary research.
- Authors
Li, Changjian; Wang, Menglin; Deng, Huanze; Li, Shumao; Fang, Xinyu; Liang, Yijie; Ma, Xihua; Zhang, Yue; Li, Yanfeng
- Abstract
Objectives: A patient with extensive atrophy of the alveolar ridge in the posterior portion of the maxilla was selected to complete an experimental and clinical case of the robotic zygomatic implant to investigate the viability of an implant robotic system in clinical use. Methods: The preoperative digital information was collected, and the implantation position and personalized optimization marks needed for robot surgery were designed in advance in a repair-oriented way. The resin models and marks of the patient's maxilla and mandible are all printed in 3D. Custom-made special precision drills and handpiece holders for robotic zygomatic implants were used to perform model experiments and compare the accuracy of the robotic zygomatic implant group (implant length = 52.5 mm, n = 10) with the alveolar implant group (implant length = 18 mm, n = 20). Based on the results of extraoral experiments, a clinical case of robotic surgery for zygomatic implant placement and immediate loading of implant-supported full arch prosthesis was carried out. Results: In the model experiment, the zygomatic implant group reported an entry point error of 0.78 ± 0.34 mm, an exit point error of 0.80 ± 0.25 mm, and an angle error of 1.33 ± 0.41degrees. In comparison, the alveolar implant group (control group) reported an entry point error of 0.81 ± 0.24 mm, an exit point error of 0.86 ± 0.32 mm, and an angle error of 1.71 ± 0.71 degrees. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). In clinical cases, the average entry point error of two zygomatic implants is 0.83 mm, the average exit point error is 1.10 mm and the angle error is 1.46 degrees. Conclusions: The preoperative planning and surgical procedures developed in this study provide enough accuracy for robotic zygomatic implant surgery, and the overall deviation is small, which is not affected by the lateral wall deviation of maxillary sinus.
- Subjects
SURGICAL robots; IMMEDIATE loading (Dentistry); PROSTHETICS; ALVEOLAR process; MAXILLARY sinus; OPERATIVE surgery
- Publication
International Journal of Implant Dentistry, 2023, Vol 9, Issue 1, p1
- ISSN
2198-4034
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1186/s40729-023-00474-2