We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
REGULATION OF MONOPOLISTIC METHODS.
- Authors
Duggan, Michael A.; Griffiths, L. C.; Werner, Ray O.
- Abstract
The article presents U.S. legal developments in marketing relative to the regulation of monopolistic methods. In 1977 the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) challenged the proposed acquisition by Tenneco of Monroe Auto Equipment Co. The FTC alleged that Tenneco controlled approximately 36% of the domestic market for exhaust system parts. In reference to collusive practices the California Computer Products v. International Business Machines, the David M. Barry, M.D., v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Co., and the Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois cases are cited. In reference to market exclusion the United States v. Professional Society of Engineers, the Surety Title Insurance v. Virginia State Bar, and the Central Bank of Clayton v. Clayton Bank cases are cited among others.
- Subjects
UNITED States; MONOPOLIES; UNITED States. Federal Trade Commission; GOVERNMENT policy on mergers &; acquisitions; INTERNATIONAL Business Machines Corp.; ANTITRUST law; COLLUSION; ILLINOIS Brick Co. v. Illinois (Supreme Court case); PRICE maintenance laws; COMMERCIAL law; PREVENTION; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
Journal of Marketing, 1977, Vol 41, Issue 4, p99
- ISSN
0022-2429
- Publication type
Article