We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
NON-ARTICLE III ADJUDICATION: BANKRUPTCY AND NONBANKRUPTCY, WITH AND WITHOUT LITIGANT CONSENT.
- Authors
Brubaker, Ralph
- Abstract
The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Wellness International Network, Ltd. v. Sharif with the non-Article III adjudications. Topics discussed include Wellness's implications for the constitutionality of non-Article III bankruptcy adjudications, determination of constitutional basis for bankruptcy judges in the U.S. Supreme Court's decision Stern v. Marshall and limits of the adjudicatory powers of non- Article III referees.
- Subjects
UNITED States; WELLNESS International Network Ltd. v. Sharif; BANKRUPTCY jurisdiction; STERN v. Marshall; BANKRUPTCY
- Publication
Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, 2016, Vol 33, Issue 1, p11
- ISSN
0890-7862
- Publication type
Article