We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients.
- Authors
Bruckmann, Nils Martin; Kirchner, Julian; Umutlu, Lale; Fendler, Wolfgang Peter; Seifert, Robert; Herrmann, Ken; Bittner, Ann-Kathrin; Hoffmann, Oliver; Mohrmann, Svjetlana; Antke, Christina; Schimmöller, Lars; Ingenwerth, Marc; Breuckmann, Katharina; Stang, Andreas; Buchbender, Christian; Antoch, Gerald; Sawicki, Lino M.
- Abstract
Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Material and methods: A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. Results: Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). Conclusion: [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. Key Points: • [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.
- Subjects
RADIONUCLIDE imaging; BREAST cancer; BONE metastasis; MAGNETIC resonance imaging; STERNUM; SENTINEL lymph nodes
- Publication
European Radiology, 2021, Vol 31, Issue 11, p8714
- ISSN
0938-7994
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s00330-021-07956-0