We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Partisan Balance and Bias in Network Coverage of the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Elections.
- Authors
Zeldes, GeriAlumit; Fico, Frederick; Carpenter, Serena; Diddi, Arvind
- Abstract
This study conceptualizes news bias as a causal factor producing systematic imbalance in the coverage of conflicting sides. Partisan bias is distinguished from structural bias by coverage that systematically favors one side with more prominence and attention. Content analysis was used to compare the television networks' balance in their treatment of Republican and Democratic candidates in stories and segments covering the 2000 and 2004 presidential elections. Presidential candidates received balanced aggregate treatment in both elections. But individual networks differed in their partisan balance. CBS News consistently favored the Democratic candidate in both elections, unlike the mixed results for ABC and NBC. CBS's pattern of imbalance, especially in the 2004 election, suggests a possible political bias in its coverage.
- Subjects
UNITED States; NEWS agencies; UNITED States presidential election, 2000; UNITED States presidential election, 2004; PRESIDENTIAL candidates; PARTISANSHIP; AMERICAN Broadcasting Co.; ETHICS
- Publication
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 2008, Vol 52, Issue 4, p563
- ISSN
0883-8151
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1080/08838150802437354