We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Is social choice gender-neutral? Reference dependence and sexual selection in decisions toward risk and inequality.
- Authors
Beckman, Steven; DeAngelo, Gregory; Smith, W.; Wang, Ning
- Abstract
This article examines redistribution of income in privately and socially risky environments. A majority of women are risk averse and behave according to the Golden Rule while a majority of men are risk seeking in some part of the income distribution and treat others differently than they treat themselves. Our experiments allow subjects to increase or reduce spreads in a five-element income distribution. All changes reduce average pay so any change is costly. Changes may be made that affect only the individual subject and reflect behavior toward risk or behind a veil of ignorance that is thought to induce just behavior, or as an observer. On average women tend to reduce spreads across all conditions, treating others as they treat themselves and reducing risk and inequality to the same degree. Thus, their behavior, on average, follows a concave utility function whether applied to themselves or others. Men generally increase spreads in at least one tail of the distribution if only their pay is affected. However, men either abstain or reduce spreads to the degree others are involved and therefore reduce spreads most when acting as observers. Behavior of men cannot be described either by a concave utility function or by a function that makes no distinction between themselves and others. The gender differences conform to theories of sexual selection.
- Subjects
SOCIAL choice; GENDER inequality; DECISION making; RISK aversion; GOLDEN rule; INCOME inequality
- Publication
Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 2016, Vol 52, Issue 3, p191
- ISSN
0895-5646
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s11166-016-9241-z