We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
The Rise of Chance in Modern Sciences.
- Abstract
This brief consideration of unpredictability and indeterminacy is intended to give an idea of how and why chance is now central to sciences. Central, because randomness was diagnosed in many areas, and because it helped provide scientists with more accurate tools to account for phenomena that could not be explained using traditional approaches. Since few things are definite with regard to the influence of randomness and disorder over the observable world, it is wise to keep in mind these two, albeit generalising, facts: first, that Determinism can lead to indeterminacy; second, that indeterminacy is not incompatible with a larger statistical Determinism. What 20th century sciences have thus shown is that the difference between chance and necessity is more blurred than was initially and instinctively thought. Chance has been proved to be not a consequence of our ignorance, neither intrinsically nor extrinsically, but instead an inner and objective property of certain systems and objects. Chance does exist. The question left to future and possibly endless generations is about the very nature of its presence: essential or accidental, fundamental or restricted? But the existence of chance is a very recent discovery, and before Poincaré and Lorenz, the overriding philosophical frame of mind was that of strict Determinism, either theological or materialistic, neither apparently willing to give any credibility to chance. In order to prepare for the introduction of Clément Rosset's thought on chance, it is now useful to concentrate on the philosophical difficulties and implications of Determinism, and in so doing to home in on the role of the concept in the field of philosophy.
- Subjects
SCIENCE; PREDICTION models; POINCARE conjecture; LORENZ equations; PHILOSOPHY
- Publication
Faux Titre, 2011, Vol 366, p17
- ISSN
0167-9392
- Publication type
Article