We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
KAVLÎ VE FİİLÎ HADİSLER ARASINDA TEÂRUZ PROBLEMİ VE ÇÖZÜM YOLLARI: MÜTEKADDİMÛN VE MÜTEEHHİRÛN ARASINDA KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR İNCELEME.
- Authors
GÜRSES, Serdar Murat
- Abstract
The hadith, in short, is the words and actions of the Prophet. It is known that the action is different from the word. First of all, practical hadiths were put into word patterns by the Companions. Even this situation alone makes it necessary to develop a different method about the actions. For this reason, Islamic scholars developed a different method while evaluating the actions of the Prophet. However, the development of this method took centuries. Early Islamic scholars left out the daily behavior of the Prophet, stipulating that the act must be for declaration. Likewise, according to them, in order for the prophet's act to be binding, the act must not be unique to him, but should concern the ummah. Subsequent scholars, on the other hand, developed these principles further and put forward a detailed method for understanding the actions of the Prophet. There may be contradictions between the words of the Prophet, and there may also be contradictions between his words and his actions. The scholars of the later period examined this issue in detail, provided many examples of the disagreement of words and actions, and claimed that the scholars of the early period evaluated the subject in the way as the scholars of the later period did. However, during this research, it was determined that there were serious differences between the scholars of the first period and the scholars of the later period in terms of eliminating the contradiction between the verbal and practical hadiths. For example, the scholars of hadith and fiqh in the early period evaluated the acts that were not specific to the Prophet and were for declaration, as if they were oral hadiths. For this reason, they did not see the disagreement of verbal and practical hadith as different from the disagreement of two hadiths. Since the 4th century, scholars have tried to resolve the aforementioned conflict by focusing on the disagreement of words and acts. As a result of this, they developed new conditions such as tamakkun and terahi for the acceptance of the actual hadith.
- Subjects
MUSLIM scholars; MUHAMMAD, Prophet, d. 632; HADITH; SCHOLARS; PROPHETS; CONTRADICTION; PRACTICAL reason
- Publication
Bilimname, 2022, Vol 48, Issue 2, p325
- ISSN
1304-1878
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.28949/bilimname.1131953