We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Next-generation angular distribution models for top-of-atmosphere radiative flux calculation from the CERES instruments: validation.
- Authors
Su, W.; Corbett, J.; Eitzen, Z.; Liang, L.
- Abstract
Radiative fluxes at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) instrument are fundamental variables for understanding the Earth's energy balance and how it changes with time. TOA radiative fluxes are derived from the CERES radiance measurements using empirical angular distribution models (ADMs). This paper evaluates the accuracy of CERES TOA fluxes using direct integration and flux consistency tests. Direct integration tests show that the overall bias in regional monthly mean TOA shortwave (SW) flux is less than 0.2Wm-2 and the RMS error is less than 1.1Wm-2. The bias and RMS error are very similar between Terra and Aqua. The bias in regional monthly mean TOA LW fluxes is less than 0.5Wm-2 and the RMS error is less than 0.8Wm-2 for both Terra and Aqua. The accuracy of the TOA instantaneous flux is assessed by performing tests using fluxes inverted from nadir- and oblique-viewing angles using CERES along-track observations and temporally- and spatially-matched MODIS observations, and using fluxes inverted from multi-angle MISR observations. The TOA instantaneous SWflux uncertainties are about 2.3% (1.9Wm-2) over clear ocean, 1.6% (4.5Wm-2) over clear land, and 2.0% (6.0Wm-2) over clear snow/ice; and are about 3.3% (9.0Wm-2), 2.7% (8.4Wm-2), and 3.7% (9.9Wm-2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA SW flux uncertainties are generally larger for thin broken clouds than for mod erate and thick overcast clouds. The TOA instantaneous daytime LW flux uncertainties are 0.5% (1.5Wm-2), 0.8% (2.4Wm-2), and 0.7% (1.3Wm-2) over clear ocean, land, and snow/ice; and are about 1.5% (3.5Wm-2), 1.0% (2.9Wm-2), and 1.1% (2.1Wm-2) over ocean, land, and snow/ice under all-sky conditions. The TOA instantaneous nighttime LW flux uncertainties are about 0.5-1% (< 2.0Wm-2) for all surface types. Flux uncertainties caused by errors in scene identification are also assessed by using the collocated CALIPSO, CloudSat, CERES and MODIS data product. Errors in scene identification tend to underestimate TOA SW flux by about 0.6Wm-2 and over- estimate TOA daytime (nighttime) LW flux by 0.4 (0.2) Wm-2 when all CERES viewing angles are considered.
- Subjects
ANGULAR distribution (Nuclear physics); ENERGY balance mass spectrometers; STANDARD deviations; FLUX (Energy); CLOUDS
- Publication
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions, 2015, Vol 8, Issue 5, p4489
- ISSN
1867-8610
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.5194/amtd-8-4489-2015