We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Die Präsidentschaftsvorwahlen der Demokraten 2020: Eine Rückkehr zur parteielitengesteuerten Kandidatennominierung vor 2016?
- Authors
Horst, Patrick
- Abstract
The presidential primaries of 2016 were seen as proof that the parties had finally lost control over the nomination of their presidential candidates. The new rules for the selection process benefited unconventional, populist candidates such as Trump or Sanders. In contrast, the 2020 Democratic primaries showed, as argued by some, that party insiders did have the power to impose the candidate of their choice after all. Such a conclusion could be premature. The Democratic contest, documented here from beginning to end, revealed many of the same problems that plagued the Republicans four years earlier. It was thanks to two exceptional factors alone that party insiders finally took the reins: the existentially felt need to beat Trump, and the impossibility of forcing the public to vote in large droves in the midst of the pandemic. Had these constraints not existed, most probably Sanders would have emerged victorious in the primaries. This leaves primary election reform on the agenda, for which some suggestions are made in conclusion.
- Subjects
TRUMP, Donald, 1946-; NOMINATIONS for public office; ELECTORAL reform; PRESIDENTIAL candidates; VOTING; REPUBLICANS; PRIMARIES; UNITED States presidential election, 2020
- Publication
Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 2021, Vol 52, Issue 2, p245
- ISSN
0340-1758
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.5771/0340-1758-2021-2-245