We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Two-staged reverse sural flap: a versatile flap with consistent results in the soft tissue reconstruction of distal leg and heel defects—an institutional experience.
- Authors
Sahu, Ranjit Kumar; Kala, Prakash Chandra; Midya, Manojit
- Abstract
Background: Reverse sural flap (RSF) is commonly used for soft tissue reconstruction of distal leg and heel defects. The classic method of flap transfer is the single-staged cutaneous islanded reverse sural flap (SS-RSF). This method is associated with variable flap complications notably the venous congestion. The other form of flap transfer is the two-stage reverse sural flap (TS-RSF), in which the pedicle of the flap is exteriorized in the first stage. Flap division and re-inset are done in the second stage. The aim of this paper is to review the flap outcomes and complications among the SS-RSF and TS-RSF reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the distal leg and heel. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of RSF being operated in a tertiary care hospital. The duration of study was 1.5 years. Twelve RSFs (6 SS-RSF, 6 TS-RSF) were done for soft tissue defects in the distal leg and heel. Wounds of various etiologies (traumatic, chronic, non-healing ulcers) were reviewed. Trauma was the most common etiology with 8 out of 12 (66.7%) patients. Large wounds, donor site damage and patients with peripheral vascular disease were excluded from the study. Results: Five out of six (83.3%) of TS-RSF healed uneventfully. However, 3 out of 6 (50%) of SS-RSF had partial flap necrosis. All complicated flaps healed well subsequently. No donor site complication was found in any of our patients. Conclusion: Pedicle exteriorization in TS-RSF eliminates the element of venous congestion and eventually flaps necrosis. Less technical expertise and minimal morbidity are additional advantages of TS-RSF. Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
- Subjects
HEEL injuries; INJURY complications; DISEASES; SURGICAL flaps; HEALTH facilities; LEG injuries; MEDICAL records; PERIPHERAL vascular diseases; SOFT tissue injuries; SURGICAL complications; PLASTIC surgery; ULCERS; RETROSPECTIVE studies; CHRONIC wounds &; injuries; ACQUISITION of data methodology; TERTIARY care; DISEASE complications
- Publication
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2020, Vol 30, Issue 2, p337
- ISSN
1633-8065
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s00590-019-02544-x