We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
An Assessment of Direct Restorative Material Use in Posterior Teeth by American and Canadian Pediatric Dentists: II. Rubber Dam Isolation.
- Authors
Varughese, Rae E.; Andrews, Paul; Sigal, Michael J.; Azarpazhooh, Amir
- Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess usage, indications, and contraindications for rubber dam isolation (RDI) by pediatric dentists in Canada and the United States. Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based, self-administered survey was utilized to collect the opinions of all active pediatric dentist members of the Royal College of Dentists of Canada and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry on the use of direct restorative materials in posterior teeth (N equals 4,648; 19.3 percent response rate). The main survey also included a domain on the RDI utilization and its perceived indications and contraindications. Bivariate and multivariate analyses for RDI usage and its predictor were performed at two-tailed P<0.05. Results: A response rate of 19.3 percent was obtained. Most participants (72.5 percent) reported using RDI "all the time." The material with the lowest usage of RDI was composite (82 percent) in the primary dentition and stainless steel crown (80.7 percent) in the permanent dentition. The three top-noted reasons for not using RDI included decreased trauma to the patient (66.2 percent), being able to prevent soft tissue from interfering without using RDI (55.9 percent), and decreased time for appointments (45.6 percent). Conclusion: Rubber dam isolation was valued by the majority of pediatric dentists when restoring primary and permanent dentition for all materials.
- Subjects
DAMS (Dentistry); PEDIATRIC dentistry; OPERATIVE dentistry; DECISION making in dentistry; AMERICAN Academy of Pediatric Dentistry
- Publication
Pediatric Dentistry, 2016, Vol 38, Issue 7, p497
- ISSN
0164-1263
- Publication type
Article