We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
DENIAL OF MOTION TO STAY -- AAA GENERAL ARBITRATION COUNCIL -- ALLEGATION OF ARBITRATOR BIAS.
- Abstract
The article focuses on the decision given by a U.S. court in the lawsuit Copen Associates, Inc. v. Dan River, Inc., in the year 1976. Where one of the grounds on which petitioner sought to stay arbitration was that the respondent had selected a division of the American Arbitration Association known as the General Arbitration Council of the Textile Industry as a Tribunal which was controlled by large organizations in the textile field, including the respondent, the court held that it was error for the court to stay the arbitration on a mere allegation of bias. The court of Special Term had granted a stay of arbitration in order to permit the petitioner to conduct disclosure on the issue of bias and control.
- Subjects
LEGAL judgments; ARBITRATION &; award; COPEN Associates Inc.; DAN River Inc.; TEXTILE industry; AMERICAN Arbitration Association
- Publication
Arbitration Journal, 1976, Vol 31, Issue 3, p223
- ISSN
0003-7893
- Publication type
Article