We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Editorial for "Diagnostic Performance of the 2018 EASL vs. LI‐RADS for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Comparative Studies".
- Authors
Chernyak, Victoria
- Abstract
As in EASL, >=10 mm observations with nonrim APHE and washout are categorized definite HCC (LR-5) by LI-RADS v2018. Diagnostic performance of the 2018 EASL versus LI-RADS for hepatocellular carcinoma using CT and MRI: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Multiple systems for imaging diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exist across the globe, of which Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) 2018 are prominent examples.[1] The systems share many similarities: both LR-5 (definite HCC) and EASL 2018 criteria can be applied only in high-risk population, both require observations size >=10 mm and the presence of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE).[[2]] To establish the noninvasive diagnosis of HCC, EASL also requires the presence of washout.[2] LR-5 criteria, on the other hand, are slightly more involved.
- Subjects
HEPATOCELLULAR carcinoma; MAGNETIC resonance imaging; COMPARATIVE studies; NEEDLE biopsy; NONINVASIVE diagnostic tests; LIVER biopsy; FATTY liver
- Publication
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2023, Vol 58, Issue 6, p1951
- ISSN
1053-1807
- Publication type
Editorial
- DOI
10.1002/jmri.28714