We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Comparative court-packing.
- Authors
Kosař, David; Šipulová, Katarína
- Abstract
In the wake of Donald Trump's presidency, a fierce discussion over expanding the US Supreme Court erupted. However, the expansion of a court's membership is just one of several court-packing techniques. Moreover, the American debate is peculiar due to the unique features of the US Supreme Court. The aim of this article is to look at court-packing from a comparative perspective, to link the debates on tinkering with courts' composition on both sides of the Atlantic, and to bring into the conversation a diverse scholarship in the Global North and the Global South. Based on experience from other parts of the world, this article provides a new, broader definition of court-packing that includes not only expansion of the court in question, but also emptying and swapping strategies. It then discusses the typical justifications for and dangers of court-packing and provides a prospective pragmatic mid-level theory that allows us to assess whether a given court-packing plan is legitimate. It argues that the legitimacy of court-packing has two dimensions: one focusing on whether court-packing pursues a legitimate aim (ius ad bellum of court-packing) and a second dimension exploring whether court-packing itself is implemented legitimately (ius in bello of court-packing). This means that even if politicians have a "just cause" for court-packing, their actions are still limited.
- Subjects
JUDICIAL Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 (U.S.); TRUMP, Donald, 1946-; UNITED States. Supreme Court; JUDICIAL process; JUDICIAL criticism
- Publication
International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2023, Vol 21, Issue 1, p80
- ISSN
1474-2640
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/icon/moad012