We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
A BAD CASE OF INDIGESTION: INTERNALIZING CHANGES IN THE RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION AFTER CRAWFORD V. WASHINGTON BOTH NATIONALLY AND IN WISCONSIN.
- Authors
Kinnally, Rorry
- Abstract
The article discusses the evolving jurisprudence in the accused's Sixth amendment right to confront the witnesses against him. It traces the history of the confrontation clause and exceptions to the hearsay rule. It discusses the new ground laid down by the U.S. Supreme Court in "Crawford v. Washington," as opposed to the earlier case of "Ohio v. Roberts." It highlights the post-Crawford categories of hearsay and their present status.
- Subjects
UNITED States; UNITED States. Constitution. Bill of Rights; RIGHT of confrontation; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL evidence; EYEWITNESS identification; UNITED States. Supreme Court
- Publication
Marquette Law Review, 2006, Vol 89, Issue 3, p625
- ISSN
0025-3987
- Publication type
Article