We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
THE JUVENILE PENALTY: A COMPARISON OF JUVENILE AND YOUNG ADULT SENTENCING OUTCOMES IN CRIMINAL COURT.
- Authors
Kurlychek, Megan C.; Johnson, Brian D.
- Abstract
This study uses criminal court data from the Pennsylvania Commission on Sentencing (PCS) to investigate the sentencing of juvenile offenders processed in adult criminal court by comparing their sentencing outcomes to those of young adult offenders in similar situations. Because the expanded juvenile exclusion and transfer policies of the 1990s have led to an increase in the number of juveniles convicted in adult courts, we argue that it is critical to better understand the judicial decision making processes involved. We introduce competitive hypotheses on the relative leniency or severity of sentencing outcomes for transferred juveniles and interpret our results with the focal concerns theoretical perspective on sentencing. Our findings indicate that juvenile offenders in adult court are sentenced more severely than their young adult counterparts. Moreover, findings suggest that juvenile status interacts with and conditions the effects of other important sentencing factors including offense type, offense severity and prior criminal record. We discuss these results as they relate to immediate outcomes for transferred juveniles, criminal court processes in general and the broader social implications for juvenile justice policy concerning the transfer of juveniles to criminal court.
- Subjects
CRIMINAL justice system; TEENAGERS; CRIMINAL courts; YOUNG adults; LENIENCY (Law); CRIMINAL law; CRIMINAL procedure
- Publication
Criminology, 2004, Vol 42, Issue 2, p485
- ISSN
0011-1384
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00527.x