We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
NO HATS IN COURT: MICHIGAN'S JUSTIFICATIONS FOR FREE EXERCISE INDIFFERENCE.
- Authors
Tucker, Joseph W.
- Abstract
The article explores the significance and constitutional ramifications of the Michigan Rules of Evidence (MRE) amendment by examining the federal and state free exercise jurisprudence. It looks into the way other jurisdictions treat the issue regarding religious dress in the courtroom and the failure of the Michigan Supreme Court in considering the Michigan Free Exercise Clause requirements. It focuses on the background of the MRE amendment and the approach to the religious dress issue.
- Subjects
MICHIGAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL evidence; CONSTITUTIONAL amendments; CONSTITUTIONAL courts; MICHIGAN. Supreme Court; DRESS codes
- Publication
University of Toledo Law Review, 2010, Vol 41, Issue 4, p1039
- ISSN
0042-0190
- Publication type
Article