We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Mixed Motives Insider Trading.
- Authors
Verstein, Andrew
- Abstract
If you trade securities on the basis of careful research, then you are a brilliant and shrewd investor. If you trade on the basis of a hot tip from your brother-in-law, an investment banker, then you are a criminal. What if you trade for both reasons? There is no single answer to this question, thanks to a three-way circuit split. Some courts would forgive you because of your lawful trading motives, some would convict you because of your unlawful motives, and some would hand the issue to the jury. Sometimes called the "awareness/use" debate or the "possession/use" debate, the proper treatment of mixed motive traders has occupied dozens of law review articles over the last 30 years. This Article demonstrates that courts and scholars have so far followed the wrong reasons to the wrong answers. Instead, this Article takes trader motives seriously, drawing on insights and solutions from the broader jurisprudence of mixed motive. This analysis generates a new legal test and demonstrates the test's superiority.
- Subjects
SECURITIES trading; JURISPRUDENCE; INVESTMENT bankers; LAW reviews; INSIDER trading in securities
- Publication
Iowa Law Review, 2021, Vol 106, Issue 3, p1253
- ISSN
0021-0552
- Publication type
Article