We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Doxing Racists.
- Authors
Barry, Peter Brian
- Abstract
If so, it can serve as a crucial part of an argument justifying doxing racists: If a racist subject violates another person's moral rights then that subject forfeits their own corresponding moral right (or some equivalent right or set of moral rights). The rights forfeiture argument is perfectly consistent with supposing that there are robust rights that otherwise probably suffice to make doxing a subject wrongful; if a racist subject retains those rights, then doxing her is not morally permissible. Thus, rights theorists have some work to do: they need to explain how individual malefactors forfeit rights in virtue of being part of a right-violating collective or why they don't. So, Some racist subjects forfeit their own corresponding moral rights (or some equivalent right or set of moral rights).
- Subjects
SELF-disclosure; DECEPTION; RACISM; ONLINE social networks
- Publication
Journal of Value Inquiry, 2021, Vol 55, Issue 3, p457
- ISSN
0022-5363
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s10790-020-09747-0