We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Whither, hither and thither, Res Gestae ? A comparative analysis of its relevance and application.
- Authors
Teong Ying Keat, Edwin
- Abstract
In Singapore, the common law doctrine of r es gestae ('RG') risks becoming extinct given the statutory inclusions of hearsay evidence. Further, the test for RG is unsettled. This article thus argues that RG is still relevant but must be applied principally. It is relevant because first, it is unwise to uproot a doctrine existing since 1808. Second, comparative analysis of cases from United Kingdom, India, New Zealand and Australia evinces the residual need for RG. Third, a modified approach to applying it can in fact exclude inadmissible evidence. This article further proposes a three-strand test. First, as a preliminary requirement, objectively, there was no concoction involved. Second, the evidence must relate to a fact-forming part of the same transaction but was not contemplated in s. 32(1) of the Evidence Act. Third, the evidence must have sufficient probative value to outweigh its prejudicial effect.
- Subjects
RES gestae (Evidence); HEARSAY evidence
- Publication
International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 2021, Vol 25, Issue 4, p326
- ISSN
1365-7127
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1177/13657127211036168