We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
A decision analysis of treatments for obstructive azoospermia.
- Authors
R. Lee; P.S. Li; M. Goldstein; C. Tanrikut; G. Schattman; P.N. Schlegel
- Abstract
: BACKGROUND Treatments for post-vasectomy obstructive azoospermia include vasectomy reversal, microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) or percutaneous testicular sperm extraction (TESE) with IVF/ICSI. We examined the cost-effectiveness of these treatments. : METHODS A decision analytic model was created to simulate treatment. Outcome probabilities were derived from peer-reviewed literature and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies database. Procedural costs were derived from a sampling of high-volume IVF centers and the Medicare Resource Based Relative Value Scale. Indirect costs of complications, lost productivity and multiple gestation pregnancies were considered. Sensitivity analyses were performed. : RESULTS Vasectomy reversal was more cost-effective than either MESA or TESE under all probability conditions. In 1999, vasectomy reversal demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness to TESE and MESA ($19 633 versus $45 637 and $48 055, respectively, equivalent to $25 321 versus $58 858 and $61 977 in 2005 dollars). In 2005, vasectomy reversal ($20 903) remained the most cost-effective treatment over TESE ($54 797) and MESA ($56 861). The cost-effectiveness of all treatments improved over projections by inflation. The relative cost-effectiveness of the therapies was unchanged over time. : CONCLUSIONS Vasectomy reversal appears more cost-effective than percutaneous TESE and MESA for treatment of obstructive azoospermia when the impact of indirect costs is considered. The absolute cost-effectiveness of all therapies improved over time. These results may be tailored with institution-specific data to allow more individualized results.
- Subjects
MEDICAL care costs; VAS deferens surgery; VASECTOMY; MALE contraception
- Publication
Human Reproduction, 2008, Vol 23, Issue 9, p2043
- ISSN
0268-1161
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/humrep/den200