We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Character and Origins of Military Attitudes on the Use of Force.
- Authors
Jost, Tyler; Meshkin, Kaine; Schub, Robert
- Abstract
Do military and civilian attitudes on the use of force differ and, if so, why? Past scholarship is divided not only on whether decision-makers with military experience are more hawkish but also in whether differences stem from organizational selection or socialization. We contribute to these debates through a unique opportunity to survey incoming military officers at the US Military Academy before and after basic training and pair the results with simultaneous surveys of a nationally representative sample. We find that future military elites are more hawkish than civilians, the gap is evident upon arrival, and initial socializing experiences cannot explain the gap. Numerous tests addressing potential socialization effects over a longer period reveal that experience may attenuate hawkishness but that it is insufficient to offset initial differences. The results indicate that preexisting attitudes shape the groups into which elites select as much as experiences in those groups shape attitudes.
- Subjects
AGGRESSION (International law); MILITARY personnel attitudes; CIVIL-military relations; MILITARY officers; ORGANIZATIONAL socialization; CITIZEN attitudes; SURVEYS; ELITE (Social sciences)
- Publication
International Studies Quarterly, 2022, Vol 66, Issue 2, p1
- ISSN
0020-8833
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/isq/sqac005