We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
I. REGULATION OF MONOPOLISTIC METHODS.
- Abstract
The article presents legal developments in marketing with particular focus on the regulation of monopolistic methods. One of the developments describes the United States Supreme Court case of the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company v. United States, et al., which clarified the extent to which a regulated industry is subject to antitrust laws. Another development discusses the case of Noerr Motor Freight Inc., et al. v. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference, et al. in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld the ruling finding the Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference guilty in attempting to restrain trade by lobbying against certain legislation that would be favorable to truckers.
- Subjects
UNITED States; MONOPOLISTIC competition; COMMERCIAL law; MINNEAPOLIS &; St. Louis Railway Co. v. United States (Supreme Court case); MINNEAPOLIS &; St. Louis Railway Co.; UNITED States. Supreme Court; UNITED States. Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit); NOERR Motor Freight Inc.; ANTITRUST law; RAILROAD companies; TRUCK drivers; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
Journal of Marketing, 1960, Vol 25, Issue 1, p75
- ISSN
0022-2429
- Publication type
Article