We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Şiî-Usûlî Gelenekte Haber-i Vâhidin Hüccet Değeri: Şerif Murtazâ Örneği.
- Authors
KORKUT, Ramazan
- Abstract
Sunni legal theorists [uṣūlists] have adressed that if the ḵẖabar al-wāḥid is sound, it will be a proof and the acting with it will be wajib. In the Shiite-uṣūlî tradition, Sharīf Murtadhā claimed that acting with it is permissible in terms of logic, but not obligatory in terms of religion. According to him, the Qur'an, mutawatir ḵẖabars and ijma including the innocent imam are the definitive source of information and are binding. Since the ḵẖabar al-wāḥid expresses suspicion, it is not evidence in religion and there is no evidence that makes this news binding. Murtazâ criticized the evidences of the uṣūlists on the subject, and the uṣūlists responded to these criticisms. Our research is based on the evaluation of the sample of Sharif Murtadha from the ḵẖabar al-wāḥid approach in the universe of the Shiite tradition. In the research, it has been determined in addition to the theology of the innocent imam that claiming that there is no evidence requires to act with the ḵẖabar al-wāḥid, is an inconsistent opinion in terms of nass, consensus and reasonableness.
- Subjects
QUR'AN; INFORMATION resources; SUNNI Islam; SUSPICION; RELIGIONS; THEOLOGY; FEMINIST theology
- Publication
Tasavvur: Tekirdag Theology Journal / Tekirdag Ilahiyat Dergisi, 2021, Vol 7, Issue 2, p1411
- ISSN
2619-9130
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.47424/tasavvur.1006857