We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Why reason? Hugo Mercier's and Dan Sperber's The Enigma of Reason: A New Theory of Human Understanding.
- Authors
Sterelny, Kim
- Abstract
The standard view of the function of reason is that it emerged to enable individuals to make better judgements and choices. Once individuals could think better, and once we had suitable communicative tools, individual reasoning acquired a public face; we reasoned together as well as privately, in our own mind. Hugo Mercier and Dan Sperber argue that this gets the story the wrong way around: reasoning evolved for public purposes: to persuade, negotiate, assess. Once it was established publically, perhaps it acquired a private function too. With the exception of a few minor complaints, this evolutionary case is well made. However, Mercier and Sperber embed their evolutionary case within a modular view of the mind and suggest a modular view of public reasoning itself. While I find the evolutionary case persuasive, I am sceptical of the cognitive science framework.
- Subjects
REASON; REASONING; VIGILANCE (Psychology); EVOLUTIONARY psychology; COGNITIVE science
- Publication
Mind & Language, 2018, Vol 33, Issue 5, p502
- ISSN
0268-1064
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1111/mila.12182