We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Spoof, Bluff, Go For It: A Defence of Spoofing.
- Authors
Khorasanee, Kasim
- Abstract
Spoofing—placing orders on financial exchanges intending to withdraw them prior to execution—is widely legally prohibited. I argue instead on two main grounds that spoofing should be permitted and legalised. The first is that spoofing as a form of bluffing remains within the market practice of making legally binding offers—as opposed to lying or betraying trust—and primarily concerns the spoofer's personal information. As a form of bluffing spoofing helps prevent financial speculators, in particular high-frequency algorithmic traders, from easily profiting by other market actors reliably revealing their underlying preferences through their market activity. The second is that at the systemic level permitting spoofing would benefit non-speculative actors who place orders to hedge economic risk and whose activities provide the raison d'être for financial exchanges, differentiating them from simple forums for gambling. I also address potential concerns that legalised spoofing would drive speculators out of financial markets entirely and, therefore, undermine market liquidity. This work contributes to the wider debate in business ethics regarding bluffing by illustrating the acceptability of bluffs which do not betray counterparty trust or reliance on testimony by remaining within the framework of market practices.
- Subjects
MARKET orders; SPECULATION; HEDGING (Finance); HIGH-frequency trading (Securities)
- Publication
Journal of Business Ethics, 2024, Vol 189, Issue 1, p201
- ISSN
0167-4544
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1007/s10551-022-05296-7