We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Mate choosiness in young male fruit flies.
- Authors
Dukas, Reuven; Baxter, Carling M.
- Abstract
Male fruit flies may be more choosy and contribute more to sexual selection and speciation than previously thought. Mate choice experiments typically use flies isolated from the other sex for a few days. We compared mate choice in young (1 day old) and mature (4 days old) male fruit flies. Young males were more choosy than mature males, most likely because mature males had been deprived of females for a few days following sexual maturity.Mate choice by males has been documented in many taxa including fruit flies (Drosophila spp.). It is still unclear, however, whether male mate choice varies much with age and one cannot readily predict the direction of change in male choosiness with age. We compared mate choice in young (1 day old) and mature (4 days old) male fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster). Young males spent much less time courting heterospecific females than did mature males, but both male categories spent similar time courting conspecific females. We obtained similar results indicating higher selectivity of young than mature males in descendants of wild-caught flies, when males had an opportunity to learn to avoid heterospecific females and when males had a choice between courting conspecific and heterospecific females. The common methodology in the discipline has been to let virgin flies age for at least a few days prior to their use in experiments. Our experiments, which employed protocols sensitive to male age and experience, suggest that male fruit flies may be more choosy than previously thought and hence can contribute much more to sexual selection and incipient speciation than previously appreciated.
- Subjects
FRUIT flies; FLIES; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA melanogaster; MATE selection
- Publication
Behavioral Ecology, 2014, Vol 25, Issue 3, p549
- ISSN
1045-2249
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.1093/beheco/aru020