We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
PLIVA, INC. V. MENSING: HOW GENERIC-DRUG MANUFACTURERS AVOIDED LIABILITY FOR "FAILURE TO WARN" TORT CLAIMS.
- Authors
Feeney, Gregory J.
- Abstract
The article discusses the U.S. court case Pliva Inc. v. Mensing wherein Gladys Mensing and Julie Demahy, did not get any compensation for the injuries they suffered. It states that the court's desicions raised question of whether the U.S. Congress should change the laws regulating generic-drug manufacturers to allow plaintiffs who take a generic drug. It further suggests that the U.S. Congress should consider the ramifications of changing the current pharmaceutical regulatory framework.
- Subjects
PLIVA Inc. v. Mensing (Supreme Court case); MENSING, Gladys; DEMAHY, Julie; WAGES; UNITED States. Congress; GENERIC drug manufacturing
- Publication
Loyola Law Review, 2012, Vol 58, Issue 1, p251
- ISSN
0192-9720
- Publication type
Article