We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Statutory Ambiguity--Garrison v. Bickford: Determining the Breadth of "Bodily Injury" in Uninsured Motorist Statutes.
- Authors
HANNA, MEELAD
- Abstract
The author reflects on the Tennessee Supreme Court case Garrison v. Bickford related to uninsured motorist (UM) statutes in Tennessee. Topics discussed include approaches to adjudicating emotional injury claims in relation to general insurance policies and UM statutes, adoption of an expansive construction of an insurance policy by the U.S Supreme Court in case Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Gotshall and Washington, D.C Supreme Court case Daley v. Allstate Insurance Co.
- Subjects
TENNESSEE. Supreme Court; UNINSURED motorist insurance -- Law &; legislation; CONSOLIDATED Rail Corp. v. Darrone (Supreme Court case); UNITED States. Supreme Court; PERSONAL injury lawsuits; ALLSTATE Insurance Co.; WASHINGTON (State). Supreme Court; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law)
- Publication
University of Memphis Law Review, 2014, Vol 44, Issue 3, p703
- ISSN
1080-8582
- Publication type
Opinion