We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Familiarization Experts in Medical Malpractice Actions: The Scope of Further Discovery After Quigley v. Kemp.
- Authors
Smith, Marvin K.; Strobel, Austin T.
- Abstract
The article discusses the utilization of familiarization expert witnesses during medical malpractice cases in Idaho, and it mentions the scope of further discovery in the aftermath of the Idaho Supreme Court case Quigley v. Kemp which deals with a debate about whether a defendant health care provider is entitled to discover the identity of a local consultant. Depositions and Idaho's district courts are examined, along with a strict locality rule in medical malpractice litigation.
- Subjects
IDAHO; UNITED States; EXPERT evidence; MEDICAL malpractice; DISCOVERY (Law); LEGAL status of defendants; DEPOSITIONS; IDAHO. Supreme Court; UNITED States district courts; ACTIONS &; defenses (Law); U.S. states
- Publication
Advocate (05154987), 2018, Vol 61, Issue 1, p32
- ISSN
0515-4987
- Publication type
Article