We found a match
Your institution may have access to this item. Find your institution then sign in to continue.
- Title
Relation of normative sciences and the predisposition to act in Peirce’s philosophy.
- Authors
Luiz Zanette, Jose
- Abstract
The article aims to show that Peirce, after realizing the appropriation that James and others made of Pragmatism, taking it far from an ideal of justice and keeping it in the service of a “nauseating utility”, whose principle was that only individual utility, including spiritual well-being, would be the ultimate goal of all practice, he sought a philosophy that would keep logic and science united in a realistic manner with laws that could be metaphysically real. In this way, he perceived the necessity to transcend the hypothetical considerations incorporated into the sense of the pragmatic maxim, attempting to distance it from nominalist risk. In this process, he took into account two new normative sciences, esthetics and ethics, in addition to logic, so that Pragmaticism, in intelligent criticism, would investigate whether an admirable end of a subject could be pursued in an indefinite and prolonged course of action, without grounding it solely on individual utility, thus replacing the ideal of justice for the renamed Pragmatism, the Pragmaticism.
- Subjects
JUSTICE; PRAGMATISM; WELL-being; LOGIC; CRITICISM; NOMINALISM
- Publication
Cognitio - Revista de Filosofia, 2023, Vol 24, Issue 1, p1
- ISSN
1518-7187
- Publication type
Article
- DOI
10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e63651